Call of Duty’s Metacritic celebration highlights a bizarr...
Related Video

Call of Duty’s Metacritic celebration highlights a bizarre Xbox problem — nobody is reviewing games on Xbox

Call of Duty has been celebrating a strong showing on Metacritic, with Activision and fans sharing the franchise's latest Metascore as a sign of the series' return to form. Yet the celebration has also exposed a strange gap that few people were talking about: there is no Xbox Metascore for the game at all. For a franchise now owned by Microsoft, that absence says a lot about the state of game reviews on the Xbox platform.



Why Call of Duty Has No Xbox Metascore



Metacritic breaks its scores down by platform, so players can compare how a game performs on PlayStation, PC, Nintendo Switch and Xbox. For Call of Duty, the PlayStation and PC pages are populated with critic reviews, while the Xbox page sits empty or falls short of the minimum number of reviews required to generate a Metascore.



Metacritic needs a minimum of four critic reviews on a platform before it publishes a score. That threshold is low, which makes the Xbox situation more striking. A flagship Xbox-owned release cannot easily clear a bar that smaller indie games on other platforms reach without trouble.



The simple reason is that outlets are not submitting reviews tagged to Xbox. Many publications review on PC or PlayStation 5 and have no reason to go out of their way to play the Xbox version as well.



How Reviewers Actually Choose Their Platforms



Reviewers typically play on whichever platform their outlet receives codes for, or whichever hardware they already own. In recent years, that has overwhelmingly meant PC and PlayStation 5. Xbox Series X|S consoles are less common in review setups, and the performance differences between versions are often too small to justify separate testing.



Because Metacritic assigns each review to a single platform, a critic who plays on PC adds to the PC score only. Even if the Xbox version is identical in content, it does not inherit that coverage.



The result is a quiet imbalance. The more outlets standardize on a couple of platforms, the fewer scores Xbox accumulates, and the easier it becomes for the platform to be overlooked in the data.



Microsoft's Cumbersome Review Code Distribution System



Part of the blame falls on Microsoft's own process. Reviewers have long complained that obtaining Xbox review codes is more complicated than on competing platforms. Codes often arrive through separate systems, with extra steps for redemption, and sometimes with delays that cut into tight review windows.



When a reviewer is up against an embargo, friction matters. If one platform delivers a code instantly and another requires a clunky process, many will simply choose the easy route.



Microsoft's wider ecosystem adds further Confusion. Between the Xbox console, the PC Store, Steam and Game Pass, it can be unclear which version a publisher is supplying and how it should be labeled when reviews are filed.



The Impact of Xbox Play Anywhere and PC Overlap



Microsoft's strategy of releasing games across Xbox and PC, often with Play Anywhere support, complicates matters further. A reviewer can play on a Windows machine and reasonably say they have covered the Xbox experience, since the game, saves and progress are shared.



For critics, this makes it feel redundant to review on both. For Microsoft, however, it means Xbox-branded scores disappear while PC scores grow. The company's own cross-platform success is, ironically, draining visibility from its console brand.



As Microsoft puts more first-party games on PlayStation and Steam, reviewers have even less reason to prioritize Xbox hardware. The platform risks becoming a footnote in critical coverage of its own games.



Why Metascores Still Matter for Xbox Players



Some might dismiss Metacritic as a vanity metric, but scores still influence purchasing decisions, marketing and how games are perceived. Store pages, social posts and press Releases regularly cite Metascores as shorthand for quality.



A missing Xbox score means Xbox players have less platform-specific information. If a version has performance issues, bugs or technical differences, there may be few critics documenting them, leaving owners to rely on user reviews and forum posts.



It also affects how the platform looks to outsiders. A blank score can suggest that a game is not important on Xbox, even when millions of players are actively using it there.



What This Says About Xbox's Platform Strategy



The gap arrives at a time when Xbox is redefining itself as a publisher and service rather than a single box under the television. Games are launching everywhere, and the company talks about reaching players on any screen. In that vision, the console is just one of many doors.



That approach may make business sense, but it has consequences for the identity of the platform. If critics, data aggregators and even fans stop treating Xbox as a distinct place to experience a game, the brand loses some of its meaning.



The Call of Duty example shows how that dilution plays out in practice. One of the biggest franchises in entertainment, owned by Microsoft, has no Xbox Metascore to show off.



Possible Fixes Microsoft Could Put in Place



There are practical steps Microsoft could take. Simplifying review code distribution, offering consoles or pre-configured accounts to outlets, and ensuring codes arrive early would all remove friction for critics who might otherwise skip Xbox.



Microsoft could also work with Metacritic and publishers to clarify how cross-platform reviews are labeled. If an Xbox and PC release is functionally the same, there may be a case for better recognition of reviews that cover both.



Finally, encouraging outlets to include Xbox-specific impressions, such as performance on Series S, could give the platform more meaningful coverage. That would help players and strengthen the case for Xbox as a platform worth reviewing.



The Bigger Lesson From Call of Duty's Milestone



Call of Duty's Metacritic success is good news for the franchise, but the missing Xbox score is a reminder that visibility does not happen automatically. Even the biggest games can slip through the cracks when the systems behind them are awkward.



For Microsoft, the challenge is making Xbox easy to review, easy to find and clearly worth caring about. Until that happens, empty score boxes may keep appearing on pages where they should be proudly displayed.



For now, Xbox players will have to look to other platforms' scores to judge their games. It is a bizarre situation for a company that owns the franchise, and one it would be wise to fix soon.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to Contact Us

← Back to Technology News